Hypnotherapy Essay -- Health, Smoking Cessation

Hypnotherapy is widely recognised, as a method for aiding grass termination, however, conflicting evidence exists regarding its efficacy. In meta analysis hypnosis proved 3 measure more in effect(p) than nicotine replacement methods, and 15 times more effective than relegateping without help (Schmidt and Chockalingham, 1992). Having said this, results are not always unclouded cut. A number of studies report a mixture of success judge i.e. 90.6% (Barber, 2001), 90% (Klager, 2004), and 80% (Crasilneck, 1990), while others report much wiped out(p)er judge of success at 48% (Elkins and Rajab, 2004) and 25% (Ahijevych, Yerardi and Nedilsky, 2000). Something else to consider is the variety of methods that whitethorn be adopted in order to treat pot cessation with hypnosis, as the efficacy of these methods may also vary (Crasilneck, 1990 Barber, 2001 Spiegel, Frischholz, Fleiss and Spiegel, 1993). However, the constant varying within smoking cessation treatment is the uncomplain ing. Therefore, treatment tailored towards the psyche needs of the smoker needs to be considered when evaluating the best approach to therapy.This is a non-clinical case study exploring whether multi session tailored treatment may relegate serve the individual needs of certain smokers. Therefore, hypnotherapeutic techniques are tailored to the unhurrieds needs in order to achieve optimum success. The patient (D) is a male actor. He lives with his partner who has recently stopped smoking with hypnosis. He is 31 yrs old and has been smoking for 18yrs. This is Ds tercet attempt at smoking cessation. Initially D attempted to stop smoking without help and was unsuccessful. Ds moment attempt problematical single session smoking cessation, and failed to achieve lasting results. Therefore a multi ses... ...to practice relaxation techniques autonomously over a three-day period before his second session of hypnosis. D had showed Case Study, London.prolonged abstinence in the knightly and is living with a significant other (who has now stopped smoking) therefore, it would reckon probable that low level of hypnotisability may have been elemental in impeding his progress, initially. Research suggests that high hypnotisability facilitates successful behaviour modification (Frischolz et al, 1993). Therefore, in Ds case, this needed to be addressed before barely therapy could commence. However, it has been suggested that abstinence from smoking does not correlate with hypnotisability (Holroyd, 1991). Nevertheless, it could be argued that within this study, low rate of abstinence i.e. 16% may have impeded impediment of a relationship between hypnotisability and outcome.