The Success of the Massachusetts Bay Colony Essay -- American History,

In the 1600s, two colonies were establishing themselves on the east bank of North America. In 1607, a group of merchants, known as the Virginia Company, settled at James township, Virginia on the Chesapeake bay tree (Divine, 72) while Puritan leader hindquarters Winthrop, stationed himself and his followers at mom Bay in 1630. (Divine, 90) Although both settlements started sullen relatively the same, the greater success of one over the other has caused invariable debates between many, including the descendants of these early Americans. Some might argue that the Virginia dependance was more successful than the Massachusetts Bay Colony because of the Virginia colonists motivation and sideline in profit (Divine, 76). However, when efforts for income turn out futile, this and survival became the colonys only interests. Therefore, Massachusetts proved itself to be the stronger colony and the most successful, as a result of its conjunction development and social advancement, its economic growth, and the positive influence the government had on the Massachusetts Colony. Instead of having scattered villages like the Virginia colony, the people of the Massachusetts Bay Colony organized communities that were small and built close together. These centers were built so that villagers were able to complete a wide range of duties such as cultivating land or fetching lumber from forests (Divine, 94). This system was especially businesslike for finishing these important tasks and allowing time for other agendas that were important to the colonists. The setup of the town was not just efficient. Families were able to live close together which helped constrain a sense of community among the people. Taverns and meetinghouses were commonly built in town, give the ... ...ve in Virginia did not mean immigrants were free from its rule. Upon departing England, those leaving would take an whammy of allegiance and supremacy (Virginia Ships List). This meant that the peopl e owed their loyalty to the crowned head of England, not to Virginia itself. The colonists of Virginia could have been frustrated that their head official was chosen by a single person, a person who had no place within their community. In fact, Berkeley, the governor the monarch of England elected, brought high taxes on the people, increased his violence at the expense of local officials and created a monopoly on Indian vocation (Divine, 85). This abuse of power is possibly one of the causes of rebellions, specifically Bacons rebellion. This body politic government leading the Virginia Colony was an increasingly stark contrast to the Massachusetts Colonys democratic government.