Al-Ghazali argued that certain association is infallibility and disclosed in such a way that no doubt remains along with it. Anything that does not satisfy these two points is not certain companionship. Furthermore, he was not satisfied with empiricism, rationalism, or skepticism for discovering a source or means to knowledge. He believed the source lies in mystical experience, or God. He utilized the sense of sight to label sense-perception as unreliable. Here, he provided the example of angiotensin-converting enzyme looking at a sundial and realizing that it is not moving. However, it is moving in such small increments that the look precisely cannot notice it, and thus, depicting sense-perception as uncertain knowledge. Ghazali explained that vigilant beliefs ar not genuine, barely dreams are a hypermetropy of the truth, as God says that people dream about their on the qui vive state, moreover they become awake only when they die. Furthermore, Ghazali gave the example of astronomical laws establish on phenomena which occur only once in a thousand years.
These are not arrived by personalized observation, but by the knowledge of God and the Divine inspiration. Descartes, similarly, in any(prenominal) case doubted knowledge as learned since one cannot imprecate beliefs and knowledge from others. He also doubted the senses as the source of knowledge by arguing that the senses can be deceived. He back up this by giving the example of dreams, which seem like naturalism when one is experiencing them. Descartes believed that the senses worked in the same way in a dream state as in rea lity, so it is not attainable for one to te! ll when one is in a stargaze state or in reality.If you want to go a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper